this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
80 points (95.5% liked)

Fediverse

31904 readers
895 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Has anyone tried it?

Ive been looking for something that can make following on mastodon easier and found this.

I just installed it and I really like the ability to go to any Mastodon site and click "Follow" and not having it re-direct to my personal site.

It doesn't seem to work with GoToSocial at least at the moment, which is unfortunate. Ill have to see if I can "trick" the API by making it think its a mastodon server.

EX: https://social.jaredzimmerman.com/@jaredzimmerman

@jaredzimmerman@jaredzimmerman.com

Follow button works very well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 53 points 2 days ago (15 children)

Personally, i don't trust giving full access of an account to a seemingly obscure extension, that is not open source.

And clearly the dev has no intention to make it open source. This was the form on me uninstalling it.

[–] kevin@kitty.ly 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Wow yikes.. I like the idea of the addon but that attitude is just nuts and uncalled for IMO. NOTE: to clarify I mean the developers response

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The option was also called "not open source / have trust issues" but i mean, no hate against the dev but i see no reason to trust it off the bat. Yeah, the response was kind of immature.

I get open source can be stressful. for example, the summit dev not making it open since they don't want to deal with PRs/issues but at the very least make it source-available. From my POV this is a cool extension that popped out of nowhere, it's risky to trust that.

I respect the up-frontness, though.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

PRs and issues are not a mandatory part of opensource.

You can literally bundle your code and serve it on some random page on a blog and it would be considered opensource.

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Oh TIL, thank you. Makes it (the decision) make even less sense, now.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Lately the definition has become a bit blurred though. Like how some people only consider something "open source" if it also has a copyleft license.

load more comments (13 replies)