For the record, this includes the "nice" landlord in your family who's "one of the good ones." We're actually coming for them first just so you stop posting pro-landlord propaganda.
this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
395 points (94.8% liked)
Liberty Hub
463 readers
25 users here now
- No Discrimination, this includes usage of slurs or other language intended to promote bigotry
- No defending oppressive systems or organizations
- No uncivil or rude comments to other users
- Discussion, not debate. This community is exclusively for genuine logical debate, any comments using whataboutism or similar will be removed.
- No genocide denial or support for genocidal entities. Anyone that supports the mass murder of civilians will be banned.
These guidelines are meant to allow open discussion and ensure leftists and post-leftists can have a voice. If you are here to learn, then welcome! Just remember that if you're not a part of the left (Liberals don't count) then you are a visitor, please do not speak over our members.
Matrix server: https://matrix.to/#/#libertyhub:matrix.org
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Seems like unique currencies for different transactions vs. one standardized state currency would certainly be a step in the right direction.
Isn't that essentially what we have now with foreign currencies? It doesn't seem to do much to curb international transactions, except create an industry of middle-men exchangers.
Maybe I misunderstood, but I was thinking more along the lines of: I'm a tailor, and you're a farmer. I need food now, but you will need 3 shirts in the future. I give you tokens to use for the shirts when you need them, and in exchange you give me some food. So it wouldn't be a state currency, but something we might use for convenience in agreeing to a trade. Admittedly, I just thought this was what was being discussed, and I haven't given it much further thought.