Forgejo

203 readers

1 users here now

This is a community dedicated to Forgejo.

Useful links:

Rules:

Posts must be relevant to Forgejo
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Try to keep discussions on topic
No spam of tools/companies/advertisements
It’s ok to post your own stuff part of the time, but the primary use of the community should not be self-promotion.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

alx@programming.dev

code.forgejo.org vs codeberg.org (lemmy.ml)

submitted 1 month ago by ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml to c/forgejo@programming.dev

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The difference between forgejo and codeberg.org is clear. Forgejo is the software and codeberg is the entity that owns it, provides the domain name, etc. and also hosts a public forgejo instance at codeberg.org.

Lately, I've seen that there is also code.forgejo.org, which I assume is run by the same people. Why are there two public instances run by the same organisation? Are users supposed to migrate from one to the other? I see that code.forgejo.org currently has version 11.0 deployed which afaik is not released yet, so is that instance just for testing purposes?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] starshipwinepineapple@programming.dev 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I see that code.forgejo.org currently has version 11.0 deployed which afaik is not released yet, so is that instance just for testing purposes?

Correct, you just don't see the disclaimer if you go straight to code.forgejo.org. if you are on the main forgejo page and click "try it now" you'll see the disclaimer:

"FOR TESTING ONLY, ALL DATA CAN BE WIPED OUT AT ANY TIME"

So to break it down:

codeberg e.V. - nonprofit democratic organization that owns codeberg.org and forgejo (or at least funds forgejo)
Codeberg.org a public forge that runs forgejo
forgejo.org - the forge software that can be self hosted
code.forgejo.org - test public forge, data can be deleted without notice

Also worth noting there are other public instances of forgejo and codeberg also encourages of alternative libre forges

[–] forgejo@floss.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

@starshipwinepineapple @ctrl_alt_esc Hi, I'd like to clarify a bit the confusion about the various instances of Forgejo:

https://codeberg.org/ — a public instance, run by @Codeberg
https://code.forgejo.org/ — instance used by Forgejo contributors for development, e.g. of the Forgejo Runner
https://data.forgejo.org/ — currently points to 2.
https://*.next.forgejo.org/ — test instances, updated daily for supported and upcoming versions (currently v7, try=v11 and v12)
~ @mahlzahn

[–] forgejo@floss.social 1 points 1 day ago

@starshipwinepineapple @ctrl_alt_esc
https://data.forgejo.org/ is the default place to get actions from that can be used within CI workflows. It may in the future be a readonly and restricted inatance (to increase availability and resistance to crawlers, etc.)
~ @mahlzahn

[–] ctrl_alt_esc@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Thank you for the clarification! I indeed hadn't seen that disclaimer. I'm aware of the other public instances, I was just wondering why codeberg itself would host multiple.

The reason I started noticing this is because I saw projects like https://code.forgejo.org/renovate/renovate which seems to have migrated to https://codeberg.org/forgejo-contrib/forgejo-renovate, but the images are still only available on code.forgejo.org (or is it data.forgejo.org which is used for the image URLs in the repo?). I suppose if code.forgejo.org is for testing only, one also shouldn't pull images from its registry.