this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2025
52 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

2391 readers
246 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The company plans to launch a more powerful single-watt version this year

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The company plans to launch a more powerful one-watt version later this year, with uses ranging from consumer electronics to drones capable of flying continuously without recharging.

The idea of using this for a drone is laughable. Their coin-size battery produces 100 uW of power, so a small drone drawing a couple dozen watts would need to somehow carry hundreds of thousands of these batteries. Even if they're only a gram each, that's still hundreds of kilograms of weight.

Use in consumer electronics is also a terrible idea. Ionization smoke detectors are already regulated due to their americium content; imagine how hard it would be to get regulatory approval for something 100,000 times more radioactive.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'm confused - they don't seem to be talking about using the 100 uW version in a drone, they explicitly mention a 1 W version. What's laughable about that?

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I guess that the 1W battery might be proportionally heavier, if it's using the same material?

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 2 points 2 days ago

That's correct.

[–] yarr@feddit.nl 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yeah but the drone might still work. What if a second drone (armed with the same battery) follows around the first drone and supports the battery through use of a tether? Then the weight isn't relevant.

[–] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 3 points 2 days ago

Four elephant-shaped drones. Which can in turn be supported by a Turtle drone.

[–] LostXOR@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Then you can make a third drone to support the second drone, and a fourth to support the third, and so on to infinity! Genius!

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

This just sounds like fly by wire with extra steps.