this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
130 points (98.5% liked)

Privacy

5718 readers
3 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I don't want to have to log into my alarm clock anymore.

"Ditch Windows" is a fair answer. I'm working on it.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I recommended a watch

Not a smart watch. A regular digital. They work great. Highly reliable. No login necessary.

[–] Rose@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Battery-powered is never reliable though.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Why not? The battery lasts about 2 years, and the LCD numbers slowly (and very noticeably) get darker over a period of weeks before it dies, so you have plenty of notice.

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

unless it lasts more than 100 years it could reasonably fail within someone's life. Nuclear energy is nice because it is more or less the only energy source that can do this.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Again, you have plenty of notice to change the battery. So it'll only fail if you fail.

exactly the worst time for it too fail. if it failed only when you treated it perfectly there would be almost no issue as you could just replace it. A good system should only ever rely on basic competence for things that instincts will remind the human to do (food and water) and not break down when the person is in a depression spiral.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 5 points 1 day ago

There are watches that don't require a battery. Some require you to rewind by hand, by turning the crown, others are powered by wrist movements.