this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2025
38 points (68.6% liked)

Privacy

36699 readers
515 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 43 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Man, I haven't seen a goat.se in years

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago (1 children)

That's probably the only reason I clicked it. Honestly, kinda regret that I did because the author just seems like a dude yelling at the sky because he's wildly critical of the smallest things but doesn't offer up any solutions.

[–] smee@poeng.link 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

So you're disappoint it wasn't a rickroll of the original image?

[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

No I think he clearly said he's disappointed by the low quality content.

The original, while disgusting, was not low quality content.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I (wrongly) assumed that if he was hilarious to have made that graphic, that he'd maybe be more reasonable, hopefully funny. I was disappoint.

It did kick off me spending about 2 hours comparing Signal to SimpleX, and Briar, and a bunch of others, and I can only conclude Signal is the best out of them. The security community seems to be REALLY paranoid about every, single, tiny little thing - but I understand that they must be.

SimpleX doesn't do any kind of IP address masking or have quantum resistant double ratchet encryption.

Briar doesn't account for rogue-tor nodes, etc.

There's just always some big glaring flaw in one of them.

[–] Poop@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Not trying to be pedantic, but the original was goatse.cx

[–] Psythik@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah everyone likes to call it "Goat-see" or "Goat-say", but it was originally supposed to be "goat-secx" i.e. "goat sex".

[–] Poop@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I think part of the confusion may be that when the site was taken down, the mirrors that sprung up were things like goat.se, etc.

I've heard it pronounced "goatsee" and said that myself back when the original site was live. You are 100% right on the intent of the name though.

[–] skankhunt42@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Is this a random thought or should I not click the link?!?

Edit: oeuf. There it is. Nice.