this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
902 points (92.0% liked)

50501

1329 readers
134 users here now

50 States, 50 Protests, 1 Movement. https://fiftyfifty.one/ | #fiftyfiftyone
This is a community related to the 50501 movement. Find the main communities at https://50501.chat/.

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS
 

remember...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 8 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"I can't vote for Harris! She was endorsed by Dick Cheney!"

By that logic, none of the people threatened by the Nazis should have accepted help from Imperialist England and racist USA.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

It was an excuse to validate inaction. Nobody actually cared about the election anymore at this point because so many foreign agents have spent so many years just pouring tons of resources into amplifying both sides of our every social issue, no matter how silly or minor, until people stopped taking a position, people just tuned out because there didn't seem to be anyone reasonable, anywhere, and we all have to survive. There are just so many hours in the day for fact-checking, and a quarter of America is functionally illiterate anyway.

On some level people knew they were just checking out and throwing the game, so that's why they clung to so many weak, frankly fucking stupid arguments against Harris.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Protest voters did not meaningfully impact the election.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I'm not even talking about "protest voters" specifically, i'm talking about the ~90 million who just didn't vote for whatever reasons. Because they were "busy" because they were confused about the issues. Because they didn't have time, because they didn't care, because they didn't like either candidate, because they liked a candidate but were afraid of popular opinion, because they were "tired of politics" and so on.

And this isn't touching on the number of people who voted Trump just for "fun" because they thought we "need the shakeup."

But all that said, if you "protest" by not voting you're dumber than rocks. Dumb rocks.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Those people will not participate unless it's required by law.

Expect at least 1 thrid of the population to never vote otherwise.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Vibes feel like a third, data shows it's closer to half of eligible voters not participating in most recent elections.

Rates have varied wildly in the US, but the last several decades (except for Biden's last run) have been low, and this is by design. Advent of media has allowed political factions to disrupt each other on a much larger scale, and the general population is too vulnerable to these attacks and appeals, and instead of making people want to get involved, the chaos makes people not want to learn the truth, so we have had elections with barely more than half of eligible voters participating.

https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/statistics/data/voter-turnout-in-presidential-elections

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Cool they will never participate so focus on the ones who will

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

I think you need to take a break from the internet and walk around in the company of live humans.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

People didn't vote for Harris because she was a colored woman, that's what voting patterns show

They just said it was because of Dick Cheney or Palestine

[–] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Reminds me of this story.

In 1980 they took a poll of people who had been eligible to vote in the 1960 election between John Kennedy and Richard Nixon. One of the questions they asked was 'who did you vote for in 1960?' In real life, the election was 51-49% a real squeaker. However, according to the poll, it was a 90-10% blow out for JFK.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Exit polls said people mostly switched to Trump because of their concerns about grocery prices, which they attributed to the current president (Biden) and thought that Harris just represented more of Biden's policies.

Exit polling is generally considered a little more viable because there's less "agenda" behind people's answers.

All this said, the real culprit here was outside influence. Over the last decade or so there have been many foreign "troll farms" paid to flood American social media with accounts boosting the loudest, most outlandish takes on BOTH sides of every social issue. This is the KGB handbook for destabilizing democracies. Racism and sexism was part of it, but so was deliberate sabotage and efforts to boost racism and sexism in the US. Which we seem to fall for with ease.

Once the general population can no longer tell what's real or not, once they can't figure out what side to take because everything is too hard to follow or too complex take a side on, they tune out. They stop getting involved. They hear a state-controlled news site (FOX, Rogan) give them a story and they shrug and accept it because they don't know the alternative.

Nearly half of eligible voters didn't turn out last election, and I say again, this was by design.

edit: user below has a history of getting banned across Lemmy, unsurprisingly, but if anyone is interested and not just here to be delusional and weird, they can look this up, election was sabotaged from many directions, if you can't handle talking about this problem, you have no business on the internet making statements. I can defend and discuss what I've learned with a cool head, can you?

https://apnews.com/projects/election-results-2024/votecast/

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know why you think if you keep posting the same meme in reply to me that I'm going to do anything other than block you. It's lame, it's 2-dimensional and self-gratifying and contributes nothing to the conversation.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Less 2-dimensional and self-gratifying than you endlessly posting your Qanon-style conspiracy theory about how all of America's problems are actually due to the perfidious machinations of conniving foreigners.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nah if you refuse to look at voting data because it goes against your narrative you can fuck right off.

The real numbers show white men/women, and hispanic men stayed home for Kamala when previously they voted for Biden.

And that's a difference of almost 13 million votes which would have made them win in 2024.

Those groups could vote for the white man but not the colored woman with the same policies.

I'm blocking you now because reality is not subjective.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't think you're actually blocking me, I think you just aren't prepared to have an actual conversation and just wanted to rant without anyone adding more complexity and nuance to your head-story. I'm not even arguing or denying that you had a point, I'm supplying you additional information and data, you should be appreciative.

I'm sorry, but reality is also more complicated than the 2-dimensional, cartoonish talking points your favorite youtube political streamer dumps on you.