cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/29107366
this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2025
62 points (88.8% liked)
Late Stage Capitalism
1761 readers
1 users here now
A place for for news, discussion, memes, and links criticizing capitalism and advancing viewpoints that challenge liberal capitalist ideology. That means any support for any liberal capitalist political party (like the Democrats) is strictly prohibited.
A zero-tolerance policy for bigotry of any kind. Failure to respect this will result in a ban.
RULES:
1 Understand the left starts at anti-capitalism.
2 No Trolling
3 No capitalist apologia, anti-socialism, or liberalism, liberalism is in direct conflict with the left. Support for capitalism or for the parties or ideologies that uphold it are not welcome or tolerated.
4 No imperialism, conservatism, reactionism or Zionism, lessor evil rhetoric. Dismissing 3rd party votes or 'wasted votes on 3rd party' is lessor evil rhetoric.
5 No bigotry, no racism, sexism, antisemitism, homophobia, transphobia, ableism, or any type of prejudice.
6 Be civil in comments and no accusations of being a bot, 'paid by Putin,' Tankie, etc.
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What a miserable person.
I used to not care at all about Rowling, so it didn't bother me that everyone loved her books.
But since she's revealed that she's also a horrible person, I feel like it's worth pointing out that she's also a horrible writer. Everything good that she put into her books is lifted from something else. The stories are meandering wish fulfillment, barely coherent and hardly ever internally consistent. Her twists are either telegraphed and obvious or non-sequitur. Her characters are one-dimensional caricatures, and the only reason they are so beloved is because they were crafted into films.
Go back and really read her stories. Read the dialogue, read the imagery, and really ask yourself, "is this good writing?" No it isn't. Is it examining interesting moral questions? No, not once. Is it clever and original? It's only clever when it's plagiarism.
You can enjoy bad writing. I enjoyed reading the later books. I enjiyed the movies. Just as you can enjoy a McDonald's cheeseburger and fries, Rowling's world of Harry Potter scratches the right itches to engage the reader and make you feel good. But that doesn't make her a good writer, anymore than the fast food burger flipper is a good chef.
JK Rowling sucks as a person, and as a writer.
Totally. I'm a big reader I enjoyed reading the HP books when they came out, but wasn't obsessed. They were good for passing the time, stuck at an airport, sitting on the beach fluffy reads. I wasn't reading them as literature, just something to relax and procrastinate. The character names often gave them away if you had any knowledge of Latin. OMG, Lupin is a werewolf and Serius Black is a dogman?!? What a shock /s
I started reading them to my kids (who liked the movies) and yikes were they bad. Larger characters have their girth pointed out at evey possible opportunity. I think everything the Dursley men did it needed to be mentioned that they did it while fat. Like 6 times in 2 pages. And her mysteries are even worse.