2
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
2 readers
1 users here now
For discussion of political opinions, including unproven accusations by public figures. Please post any newsworthy item in the News community, this community is for sharing opinions rather than sharing news.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
ITT Republicans mad that rules apply to the senile husk of a man they would have as their god-king
Even if Trump is too old to be president, and even if Trump were to look and act like Biden, this is still an incredibly controversial decision as it absolutely interferes with an election.
If we let criminals escape punishment because they're running for office then criminals will just use that to escape the law. No, allowing that traitor to skate would be controversial. It was his decision to run for office while under criminal investigation, he doesn't get a get out of jail free card just because he wants to shit in the white house using government toilet paper again
Nobody is suggesting that the trial doesn't go forward and is nullified...
The suggestion is that they get to speak freely about the trial as it goes forward and don't have their speech limited.
Also what do you think of the novel legal theories being employed against Trump in these particular charges?
Nope, not how it works. Witness tampering is illegal for a reason.
So they say it's actually about not contaminating the jury pool through making these statements.
Of course I would never endorse some scenario where Trump is literally cornering witnesses and threatening them or trying to meddle... That would be bizarre.
This is about curtailing the speech of someone during their own electoral campaign.
Trump is absolutely capable of and willing to bully and harass judges, lawyers, witnesses, and potential jurors through the press. Gag orders are a common and normal part of trials like this and are not controversial. He can say any dumbass thing he wants once the trial is over.
Yes, once the Kangaroo court does its damage in the middle of the most important election in the world, he's free to point out how silly it is.
"Stay still while we pin you down during the race - you will be free to complain about this once the race is done. After all, there won't be another one for years."
Kangaroo court? He's such a guilty motherfucker he makes OJ look innocent. Be serious.
Half of these involve novel legal theories - making the CEO of a corporation a felon for the crime of how his bonuses were paid out in the state of New York, claiming that Pres. Trump tried to remove the rights of the American people via Jan 6th...
As Alan Dershowitz pointed out, there is something to be said for the classified documents case, but it is also clear that it is a case of selective prosecution.