258
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
258 points (93.0% liked)
Technology
35022 readers
121 users here now
This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.
Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.
Rules:
1: All Lemmy rules apply
2: Do not post low effort posts
3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff
4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.
5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)
6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist
7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
For sure, hands are generally getting better, but they are still a persistent problem. Mostly you need a prompter who isn't lazy and is actually looking at the outputs.
That would require paying someone to work, which is what they want to eliminate with AI.
The AI checks the AI, it's recursive and we're part of the simulation.
And next year, the AI will check us due to being embedded into our minds. Can't have any rogue humans
That's how we reach singularity
Weren't we all supposed to become "prompt engineers"?
Right, but the person who prompted this image exists right now and their job will exist for the foreseeable future, so they need to not suck at their job until they're no longer needed. I personally don't see generative AI gaining the creative ability to define its own prompts in the near future, even if its generative outputs improve to the point where you don't need an experienced prompter to ensure that hands aren't deformed. Prompters are still going to be needed for highly specific prompts.