this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
29 points (96.8% liked)
Australian Politics
1514 readers
83 users here now
A place to discuss Australia Politics.
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australia (general)
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
After stalling positive environmental legislation all last year, probably for the best.
Let something good through, even if it's not good enough. Something is better than nothing.
Something good is not better than something really good, though. That's always where the balance lies for The Greens. They have an obligation to the hard left of their party to be tough negotiators but they do risk frustrating the softer left who ultimately don't want to see Labor governments being sacrificed in the pursuit of Greens objectives. Labor governments also have a responsibility to everyone, including their voters, to ensure legislation does actually get passed and that means they need to be willing to make concessions to The Greens. It is a line that is getting harder to navigate as The Greens grow and their relationship with Labor becomes more volatile due to greater influence in the electorate, particularly in those seats where they are now direct competitors to Labor.
It's also important that the legislation survives a Liberal government, and can't be used as a campaign point by the Liberal government to win election (see 2013).