this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
748 points (98.6% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

3040 readers
264 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

well it might’ve worked if he didn’t turn out to be a fascist… but since most people don’t want to support that, kinda fucks up the business model.

perpetually burning up satellites in the atmosphere is a pretty shitty business though.

[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 weeks ago (11 children)

perpetually burning up satellites in the atmosphere is a pretty shitty business though.

Exactly. The business isn't remotely sustainable. All that money being invested into new satellites will, by next year, need to be invested constantly to keep the network at the same size.

Starlink needs run as fast as it can, just to stay in the same place, and the investment money is finite when people see it's not going to grow.

[–] Zetta@mander.xyz -4 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

Starlink is already making more money than it costs to expand and operate, you are wrong. This is sustainable (financially) and counter to your beliefs over the next 10 years I'd wager the starlink network will balloon to many times its current size, 20,000 plus satellites in orbit.

SpaceX is the most successful company/entity in history that does space launch, it doesn't cost them a whole lot of money to launch new batches of Satellites and that cost will continue to decrease as the Falcon 9 program continues to improve and as starship becomes operational over the next few years.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

With how many government handouts though?

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)