Gsus4

joined 2 years ago
[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 25 minutes ago* (last edited 21 minutes ago)

That's a weak counterargument: that was 500 years before the cruzades. 500 years ago, Europe/Christians were doing slavery, giant wars of religion, the inquisition, genocide, etc. I like to think we've improved somewhat, but it's only been 80 years or more if you count from the declaration of rights of man.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 30 minutes ago* (last edited 29 minutes ago) (2 children)

I thought it was accepted as historical fact (for decades, this isn't some new "woke" reading) that the regressive/barbarian/terrorists were (mostly) the christians during e.g. the cruzades and the tolerant/intellectual/honorable were (mostly) the muslims in that time due to mass education (every muslim had to be able to read arabic) and feeling like the chosen people (which decayed after the sack of Baghdad by the Mongols, of all heathens)

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 59 minutes ago

Yeah, we gonna need loads of that for 7th gen fighters, resilient next-gen green smart grids, etc. Bon voyage!

PS: we're not better than the US, but at least our political systems can delay full fascist takeover for about 5-20 years...which may be enough time to reverse it politically or to at least create defenses against it.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 39 minutes ago)

I don't get it, why do these guys not just move to islamic countries? There are plenty to choose from and they can live the full holy life they want there, as Muhammad would have wanted them to. Nobody is forcing him to live surrounded by infidels.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 8 points 1 hour ago

Brain drain? They're flushing them!

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (1 children)

No, they won't, as you can see, they enjoy being politicians and keeping their power well into their 90s, it's not a factory job. The only defense of that is that they represent (badly) older populations of retirees from shit jobs.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (3 children)

The point is that political systems are full of old people and you're saying they should be forced to stay there even longer to "teach them a lesson", which is just laughable. So I gave you the most flagrant example of a gerontocracy to display how that is a stupid idea.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yea, but I was thinking of socialism in practice e.g. China has private property...it's just that it's not an absolute right, it is secondary to some other interests i.e. the state/workers/etc look at what they did do Jack Ma when he started getting too elon musky for their liking.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (5 children)

Look at Nancy Pelosi, tramp, Biden, turtle Mitch, even Bernie...they are all above 70, tons of dudes above 80 and even 90 in congress and the senate. I don't want that for anyone.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 4 points 7 hours ago (8 children)

...looks at the US's gerontocracy...dude...no.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Yeah, I think bibi may have finally worn out israel's permanent default monopoly on victimhood that made him think he could get away with anything forever.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 8 hours ago
 

A provision "hidden" in the sweeping budget bill that passed the U.S. House on Thursday seeks to limit the ability of courts—including the U.S. Supreme Court—from enforcing their orders.

"No court of the United States may use appropriated funds to enforce a contempt citation for failure to comply with an injunction or temporary restraining order if no security was given when the injunction or order was issued," the provision in the bill, which is more than 1,000 pages long, says.

The provision "would make most existing injunctions—in antitrust cases, police reform cases, school desegregation cases, and others—unenforceable," Erwin Chemerinsky, the dean of the University of California Berkeley School of Law, told Newsweek. "It serves no purpose but to weaken the power of the federal courts."

 

Immigrants’ attorneys say they were told they were being deported to South Sudan. But Trump’s lawyers won’t say where the plane is—claiming everything is classified.

 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/18936370

http://www.smbc-comics.com/comic/calculating-2

Alt textImagine doing internal fertilization without telepathy. I mean holy shit!

Bonus panelBonus panel

 
 

President Donald Trump is backing off a plan to rename the Persian Gulf the Gulf of Arabia after backlash from Iranian officials, according to a report by CNN.

view more: next ›