this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2026
1059 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

86302 readers
3317 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WhosMansIsThis@lemmy.world 12 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

How do we feel about 'pedofocals'?

[–] Krelis_@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

~~I was thinking Rapeshades~~

Edit: actually this is even better

[–] swooper@lemmy.world 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I’m never buying Ray Bans again. I don’t want to be associated, fuck Ray Bans for taking that cash.

[–] db_null@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 27 minutes ago (1 children)

What I told the guy at the optician last month. "Let's skip the RayBan rack all together."

[–] cecinestpasunecommunication@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 9 minutes ago* (last edited 9 minutes ago)

I don't want to look like a rapist. Are you telling me I have creepy rapist vibes?

[–] eicker@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Zuck is killing the whole industry. 😔

He finally did something good.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 8 points 2 hours ago

also it has the stigma of Zuckerberg using his companies as datamining, spying, right wing peddling platforms. his name was enough to derail anything that comes out of meta.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 hours ago

And they should be.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 32 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Shame is a greatly underrated emotion.

[–] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 4 points 2 hours ago

The problem is that some people have adapted an immunity to it.

[–] Adderbox76@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

100%. I've been saying it for years that at the end of the day, the only punishment that actually works is the public shaming.

Bring back the public perp walks. March the criminal through the streets with a big banner announcing their crime, and then leave them them in a public cell in the middle of town for a few days with their name on it, their crime, and no privacy so that people can come and see them.

A few days of that will do more to cure recidivism than any jail you can name.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 hour ago

Except private prisons need the prisoners to get paid. They want the recidivism to continue.

Ah, the good old days when we could gather in a mob and throw turds at criminals in the town centre. Might work, actually.

[–] Alpha71@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It's nice to see no one learned anything from Google Glass. This is why we're fucked as a species...

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

ive only seen it once it public and then never after that day. i think people got the message the moment articles came out about it. but Zuckerborg intends to push this out regardless.

[–] S4m_S3p1l@infosec.pub 2 points 1 hour ago

Who woulda' thought suckerberg - the man responsible for running intelligence ops on billions of devices in broad daylight, would be outta touch with evolving cultural norms!

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 11 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Now do billionaires, and we golden!

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 hours ago

And politicians.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

How do we feel about flock or similar camera networks around the world? Like yeah a dude with cameras on his face is one issue and then there's the systemic distribution of millions of cameras which is arguably worse but feels more normal to many.

[–] Squirrelanna@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 9 minutes ago

Does it? Most people I know on all sides of the political spectrum absolutely dispose the mass surveillance and have openly done so since cameras at traffic lights became a widespread thing.

[–] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 2 points 41 minutes ago (1 children)

That's a whole different issue. I cannot choose to install flock cameras in my city, but I can choose to buy and wear meta glasses or not.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 1 points 12 minutes ago

Yes and no. Like towns have town halls where such issues are voted on or debated. There are most definitely actions individuals and more importantly communities can take to stop the spread of distributed surveillance. There are already laws about filming in private locations aka it's currently illegal for someone to be filming in a public restroom or in your house or in a business they don't own.

[–] 1984@lemmy.today 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I think the glasses are worse since they will film you up close, anywhere, and end up on social media to laugh at or to jerk off to.

This is a product that should not be allowed to be distributed to the public. But we live in an age where decency and respect for others is low.

[–] Zephyr@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 hour ago

Yeah it's a more jarring and immediate concern than the amorphous state level data collection and profiling concern of distributed systems although both boil down to privacy concerns. Like its one thing to have a dash cam in your car or a household security camera or even for a business to have internal and external security cameras it's another thing all together for the state to have a distributed camera network accurately tracking everything you're doing or for an Individual to be illegally recording in private locations to make compromising content.

[–] roboaddy@aussie.zone 35 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I just don't understand why they even tried. Google already proved in 2013 that people think you're an asshole for wearing things like this, even having the term "glasshole" come about.

Same mental disorder, different CEO?

[–] FreddiesLantern@leminal.space 13 points 4 hours ago

Backlash not strong enough imo but good news is good news.

load more comments
view more: next ›