Privacy

39154 readers

1150 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn't great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
Don't promote proprietary software
Try to keep things on topic
If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
Be nice :)

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

Keeping "smart" devices on guest network (lemmy.world)

submitted 3 weeks ago by applemao@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

13 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I realized I was at risk by having smart devices on my normal network, so decided to move them to my guest network.

I don't like my smart tv, but it's all I have to work with for now. I want to keep it on my guest network, but still stream using jellyfin. I see on my netgear router there is an option to "let devices on guest network see other devices and access local network" which would probably allow it to see my jellyfin server, but then doesn't that defeat the point of a guest network? Maybe I need to learn what a reverse proxy is...jellyfin server is currently on windows (not my pc) but could move it to my linux pc if needed.

And yes, I plan to get a media center linux box in the future so I don't have to deal with the garbage smart tv os!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CosmicGiraffe@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, but that's not the setup you described in the original post. I think that's probably where your confusion is coming from - people are responding about a setup that's just a PiHole, not a PiHole plus router features to ensure that it's used.

Ultimately any setup that allows the device internet access is going to introduce some opportunities for tracking/telemetry/ads. If the vendor really wants to they could just channel all that data through a single HTTPS connection, along with the useful data you want to let the device access. You won't have any way to inspect that traffic and selectively block it, so you end up having to chose between blocking everything or blocking nothing.

Your setup sounds like it's reaching the privacy/functionality trade off that you want.