this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
72 points (97.4% liked)

Games

20060 readers
842 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 28 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (9 children)

Steam just needs to move to x64 and work on some way to port/emulate 32-bit for older games.

Honestly this is on Valve imho, moreso than Redhat or Ubuntu or any distro providers.

32-bit is dead and it's somewhat absurd that Steam is still 32-bit.


I just checked, and while I usually shit on Epic game launcher, theirs is 64-bit by default, they don't even offer a 32-bit version of the store. This is squarely on Valve.

[–] CountVon@sh.itjust.works 13 points 6 days ago (5 children)

The Steam client is just a launcher. Why is it Valve's job to make sure that legacy 32-bit games continue to run? They're not the vendor of the game, and they're not the vendor of the OS. They're just a middleman. If the game vendor doesn't want to patch it to 64-bit, and the OS vendor doesn't want to maintain 32-bit compatibility, then there's simply no more support for that combination of OS and game. Valve isn't required to step in there.

It may surprise you to learn that Valve already switched the client to 64-bit... for Mac. OSX hasn't had 32-bit support since 2019, but it still has a Steam client! Valve didn't do anything for 32-bit-only Mac titles, except drop the "Mac OS compatible" tag once Apple had dropped 32-bit support. That's all they're ever going to do for 32-bit-only PC titles, when/if OS vendors completely drop 32-bit support.

32-bit is dead and it’s somewhat absurd that Steam is still 32-bit.

Tell that to anyone who bought a legacy title on Steam and now wants to run it on modern hardware. Leaving the Steam client at 32-bit is simply a low-effort way to ensure that the OS has the 32-bit libraries that will be required by any 32-bit title the user happens to launch.

[–] imecth@fedia.io 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

low-effort

People always underestimate the work that goes into making sure stuff works. These packages need to be built so they add a lot of compile time to the pipeline, these packages have limitations inherent to 32 bits so they also add troubleshooting and bugs. This is time and resources that could be spent elsewhere.

[–] Eggymatrix@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago

Not valve's resources though, so from their point of view its low effort

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)