Tragedeigh: shitty baby names

158 readers

1 users here now

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone

155

It's a tragedeigh (sh.itjust.works)

submitted 6 days ago by hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/tragedeigh@lemmy.blahaj.zone

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] oftheair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (11 children)

2SLGBTQIANBP+ or LGBTQIANB2SP+

Two Spirit
Lesbian
Gay
Bisexual
Transgender
Queer/Questioning
Intersex
Asexual/Aromantic/Agender (never for allies)
Nonbinary
Pansexual/Polyamorous
Plus (for other identities)

[–] rbn@sopuli.xyz 5 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I guess it's pretty discriminating that some orientations get more letters than others, one even is allowed to have a number and potentially many more have to share just one single +. Why not use only the + for everyone? ♥️

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Personally think GSRM should be more popular. Its short and includes everyone, and isnt making a a hidden declaration that some minorities are more special by having their own letter (thus the reason for appending more to the alphabet soup)

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

Thanks for teaching-me-about/reminding-me-of that acronym.

I've been advocating for the adoption of "people with minority Sexual Orientations and/or Gender Identities" ie "SOGI minorities" or "SOGIm".

I think I still prefer " SOGI minorities" because it's inclusive, and the acronym sort of stands on it's own e.g. I recently learned my province has SOGI curriculum as part of the school system. It's not just about SOGI minorities, it's about helping kids understand what gender is, and isn't.

I do like how GSRM articulates the difference between sexuality and romance though.

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (8 replies)