this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
15 points (100.0% liked)
Vegan
3355 readers
23 users here now
An online space for the vegans of Lemmy.
Rules and miscellaneous:
- We take for granted that if you engage in this community, you understand that veganism is about the animals. You either are vegan for the animals, or you are not (this is not to say that discussions about climate/environment/health are not allowed, of course)
- No omni/carnist apologists. This is not a place where to ask to be hand-holded into veganims. Omnis coddling/backpatting is not tolerated, nor are /r/DebateAVegan-like threads
- Use content warnings and NSFW tags for triggering content
- Circlejerking belongs to /c/vegancirclejerk
- All posts should abide by Lemmy's Code of Conduct
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Yeah. Right. How long would a 10% reduction last before we were right back where we were.
what do you mean? i think a 10% reduction on the consumption of meat is overall plausible to achieve.
First of all, the goal here is simply to meet the Chinese governments "Sustainable Development Goals." That's what "could help protect ground water" means. It's a meaningless goal from the perspective of veganism or even global conservation.
But it's also a meaningless solution. The rate of consumption increases each year. In that context, the goal isn't just, "eat 10% less meat", it's, "establish a hard limit on the amount of meat consumed, which is 10% less than our current rate of production." Maintaining that hard limit becomes a larger and larger commitment each year, with a growing population sharing a fixed amount of meat. There might be a mechanism for accomplishing that IN CHINA, but globally that is an utterly unimplementable solution to any problem that animal ag is currently causing.