this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
99 points (100.0% liked)

news

24174 readers
603 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today/ . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Donald Trump's cuts to the USAID office are projected to result in the deaths of '14 million people,' many of whom are children, according to a recent study published in The Lancet.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] StillNoLeftLeft@hexbear.net 38 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Insert here again the Grapes of Wrath quote. ooooooooooooooh

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 28 points 1 day ago (3 children)

But the Grapes of Wrath quote doesn't even make sense here, right? The US would prefer to give away food to the global South for free. That's one of the things that the US does for soft power. Give food aid to client states to undermine their local agricultural industry (can't compete with free food), make them dependent on your food exports, then make them agree to the conditions of structural adjustment programs.

Am I crazy? Like, the point of USAID was pretty clear, what the hell is going on?

[–] BynarsAreOk@hexbear.net 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I think its already clear that the majority of the global south is irrelevant now, its the logical conclusion of the end of history people. USAID was a very old initiative from the 60s, its over 60 years old. Trump is ripping off the mask of what was already quite the trend of the last 2 decades imo.

To give a clear example, the Ukraine war issue around Ukrainian grain exports. They tried to claim it was going to poor countries but in reality Ukrainian grain goes to Europe and China and it is Russia who are one of the biggest agricultural exporters e.g grain and fertilizer(biggest in the world even) to the global south. So they completely believed just telling the world it was "Putin's war" as if the global south gives a shit. They maintained the sanctions and did not acknowledge the crisis at all.

If the liberals in charge back then understood soft power, they would have immediately done something to stabilize the global food market. But obviously that is impossible, after all western companies were making huge profits from this inflation too. Maybe they would have understood to e.g not put sanctions on Russian agricultural exports, again though, impossible to imagine. As a result Russia-BRICS and others got a huge amount of free anti-western sentiment because it was clear it was western sanctions to blame.

These people already proved they are not that much smarter than Trump. So IMO the point is the last 1-2 decades of geopolitical conflicts kind of already destroyed US soft power, Trump is only far more blatant about it.

I mean you can even look at Gaza, they could have done a proper theatrics by allowing some form of aid and telling Israel "maybe just keep the genocide to Palestinians only and not the UN staff too, you know the ones we spent decades legitimizing as heroes", but its not like Biden gave a shit either. The concept of USAID soft power is not even effective anymore I'm willing to say probably for years now.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)