Alaskaball

joined 5 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 67 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Featured post by user oliveoil on a request to residents in the agressor nations to attempt to assist in anti-war efforts through economic actions

Reply to this post with additional material on how to participate in the anti-war movement.

Site is starting to slow down for some. please upload videos to other sites then post the link here instead of directly embedding them into the site. If you have posted embedded videos to this page before, when you have the time, please edit your comments containing the videos and swap them out for off-site links.

Try to follow rule 6 a bit harder while the conflict is actively ongoing to keep the news mega clear and on topic.

General notice: do not use dd geopolitics as a source of information as it it ran by the fascist party ACP and its fascist collaborators.

Stop posting AI slop to the mega. If you can't verify something, don't post it.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 9 points 3 days ago

The "more communist than the communist internet community" was taken over by petty bourgeois radicals, if I got paid a dollar for every time I've seen it happened I'd have 2 dollars.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 36 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Gotta get a legislative motion of congressional approval for the president to activate the Selective Service System. The president can't force conscription at will under the current system of power.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 66 points 4 days ago (4 children)

The straits are not okay

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If you can't maintain a system of logistics extending beyond the walking distance of a single village you don't have a cohesive ideology.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 2 points 5 days ago

If you're going to be publicly reading the book at the meeting instead of saying 'read X chapter before the meeting' have a format where you read for X amount of minutes then break for a discussion period for X amount of minutes, where you alternate between reading and discussing until the end of the session. To make sure discussions don't get out of hand, follow a loose sort of roberts rules for meetings where you have a speakers list that allots like 1-2 minutes of speaking time per person with new people having priority and repeat speakers being sent to the bottom of the list every time they raise their hand.

So like initially if we're having a discussion where I raise my hand, jimbo raises his hand, Octavia raises her hand, Josh raises his hand, Jessica raises her hand, and Trotters raises his hand, the speaking list would be as follows

  1. Alaskaball
  2. Jimbo
  3. Octavia
  4. Josh
  5. Jessica
  6. Trotters

And let's say that by the time we reached Josh, I want to speak again because someone said something that inspires me to add to it BUT another person who hadn't spoken, Kiara and José, both raise their hands at the same time. The list would look like as follows

  1. ~~Alaskaball~~
  2. ~~Jimbo~~
  3. ~~Octavia~~
  4. Josh
  5. Jessica
  6. Trotters
  7. Kiara
  8. José
  9. Alaskaball

Make sure you keep track of the allotted time for discussion periods to make sure you don't burn your reading time by being firm with saying who's going to be the last speaker for this round but you'll keep the list of speakers who didn't speak so the next round they can go first if they wish to.

This communal reading and discussing style can seem slower for the more book savvy and intelligentsia types but public reading discussions definitely helps build a common foundation of theoretical literacy for the group as a whole.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 30 points 6 days ago

Vooshsolidarity acp 2033

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 81 points 1 week ago

Featured post by user oliveoil on a request to residents in the agressor nations to attempt to assist in anti-war efforts through economic actions

Reply to this post with additional material on how to participate in the anti-war movement.

Site is starting to slow down for some. please upload videos to other sites then post the link here instead of directly embedding them into the site. If you have posted embedded videos to this page before, when you have the time, please edit your comments containing the videos and swap them out for off-site links.

Try to follow rule 6 a bit harder while the conflict is actively ongoing to keep the news mega clear and on topic.

General notice: do not use dd geopolitics as a source of information as it it ran by the fascist party ACP and its fascist collaborators.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 36 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Dd geopolitics is ran by acp and a Mussolini styled fascist

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

That terminology was invented as cope because all the other branches spec-ops groups were getting butthurt that only the Army had de jure claim to being labeled as Special Forces.

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Navy seals aren't special forces. They're special operations.

Also this is complete speculation and not confirmed news

[–] Alaskaball@hexbear.net 53 points 1 week ago (6 children)

Diva has an account on hexbear, therefore is automatically branded with the original sin, which is as American as Apple pie, of being a stankie red fash-ionista

 

https://archive.is/QfphH

Workers have been falling behind dramatically in the tug of war between capital and labor, stoking serious concern about the trust holding the economy and society together.

What trust?

Diane Swonk, chief economist and managing director at KPMG, highlighted troubling data on corporate versus workers’ earnings that were included in a report she recently authored.

Western economist finally figures out the obvious, shocks the rest of the financial elite, more at 11.

It showed corporate profits as a share of U.S. GDP have soared to 15.85% from 8% in 1982. By contrast, employee compensation as a share of GDP has tumbled to 61.9% from 66.6% in 1982.

While labor’s slice of the economy has previously been lower than it is today, the overall trend line has pointed down, and the gap compared with corporate earnings is now at a post–World War II record high.

That record high was when the profits to pay was inverted, as in people were actually being paid well under the post-war social-democratic system to the point corporation profit margins were slim as oil on a
dipstick. Obviously Capital really didn't like that.

“This chart from my recent Economic Compass still haunts me,” Swonk said in a social media post last week. “A friend refers to it as the ‘revolution chart,’ which [is] disturbing but telling. Inequality fuels social and economic instability.”

Don't believe for a second all the priests of Capital that is the neo-liberal economist are all high off their own hogs. There are enough among them who actually know capitalist economics to analyze and comprehend the critical flaws of capitalism leading to its own ruptures

She added the divergence helps explain how the economy looks on paper versus how it’s experienced by most Americans.

What I said above. They're not all tools.

Indeed, while aggregate data show cooler inflation, steady income gains, and resilient consumer spending, the details reveal a sharp divide. For example, the richest 20% of households account for nearly all U.S. spending growth since the pandemic, while the bottom 80% have merely kept up with inflation.

Today, Americans grapple with an affordability crisis that has stretched across a range of basic expenses, including food, electricity, insurance, health care, childcare, and housing.

Observe carefully the key wording used, the acknowledgment that "food, electricity, insurance, health care, childcare, and housing." are all basic, as in first line, expenses. That the overwhelming majority of Americans are walking a razors edge from financial ruin. That the economic numbers being put out by the lying capitalist press are only representing the 20% of financially stable Americans with surplus wealth - and of course not counting all the bullshit moneybag passes that are done to artificially create the image of financial growth - and reality is growing starker and darker by the day for the working class. The enemy is aware.

“It gets to the multi-decade erosion in trust—there is an undercurrent of betrayal,” Swonk warned. “Something in our economic narrative is broken.”

In her report, she explained this loss of trust extends globally and across multiple decades, but especially in developing economies over the past year.

At the same time, the generative AI revolution and President Donald Trump’s tariffs have stirred more economic anxiety about job safety.

“CEOs are citing AI as a reason for hiring freezes and layoffs, before the productivity associated with AI is realized,” Swonk wrote. “That could prove penny-wise and pound-foolish; it stokes public backlash to AI, which is intensifying.”

To be sure, there are still some tailwinds that should benefit workers and the overall economy. Trump’s tax cuts will deliver a temporary lift; the World Cup will help ease a tourism downturn; inflation will continue to gradually cool; and massive AI capital expenditures will keep propping up GDP growth.

On the other hand, investors are nervous; uncertainty still hangs over the direction of economic policy; and the housing market remains in the doldrums, she said.

“The result is an economy that appears resilient but feels increasingly fragile,” Swonk concluded. “Growth has held up, yet the connective tissue that supports labor markets, investment, and global cooperation is fraying. Workers are more anxious, investors more herdlike, and markets … more vulnerable to shocks than headlines suggest.”

Her warnings echo what Nobel Prize–winning economist Daron Acemoglu has been saying for years about the origins of economic and political decay.

In a recent interview with Fortune’s Jake Angelo, he said the U.S. is headed for a grim future and outlined two shifts relative to AI development he sees as critical to avoiding deeper decline: cracking down on economic inequality and tempering job destruction.

“If we go down this path of destroying jobs [and] creating more inequality, U.S. democracy is not going to survive,” Acemoglu said.

 
 
 
 
 
 

Folks how would you answer the question?

Clip here

Genuinely a good gut-buster of a sorta podcast-styled stream if you want to have some funny background noise. (Watch it, it's great)

Full stream here

 

Also stretching. Or massaging my feet instead of putting on socks

 
 
view more: next ›