101
Scientists reportedly hiding AI text prompts in academic papers to receive positive peer reviews
(www.theguardian.com)
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
Those authors should be screened loads forever more. They do not respect the purpose of the scientific process if they are solely trying to push themselves forward.
Or maybe AI shouldn't review things? Who knows what they are hallucinating.
Yeah absolutely, but researchers who are attempting skirt review processes to only receice positive feedback are not respecting the process.
What's to respect in an AI review where they didn't even review the output. It's an LLM lazy review. Deserves to be gamed.
Yes, the reviewers should not be using it. The researcher shouldnt be submitting it with the intention of gaming it.
AI is not all LLM chat bots, there are legitimate AI implementations used in research.