Those authors should be screened loads forever more. They do not respect the purpose of the scientific process if they are solely trying to push themselves forward.

[–] DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Or maybe AI shouldn't review things? Who knows what they are hallucinating.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Yeah absolutely, but researchers who are attempting skirt review processes to only receice positive feedback are not respecting the process.

[–] CrypticCoffee@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What's to respect in an AI review where they didn't even review the output. It's an LLM lazy review. Deserves to be gamed.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world -1 points 1 week ago

Yes, the reviewers should not be using it. The researcher shouldnt be submitting it with the intention of gaming it.

AI is not all LLM chat bots, there are legitimate AI implementations used in research.

load more comments (1 replies)