Starmer trying to act like he did something, because otherwise he'd have to come to terms with the fact he had zero impact.
Screw off into retirement, you personality vacuum.
Sounds about right. Fits in with the 80:20 rule. Does the first 80 quicker than the 20% of time it usually takes but does the next 20% which takes 80% of the time even slower.
Effectively, it optimises the quicker bit so you suffer long term and overall waste more time while screwing the planet. It's only fine for prototyping and even then, would that be the best base to build off? Is it modular and maintainable? Does it have low coupling and high cohesion? Or is it just trash?
Wait. This is in America and you're sharing a .co.uk link?!
I almost shit myself, but hopefully the burrito I consumed was not contaminated.
Similar issues in the UK too. AC is becoming essential in summer, especially for heatwaves.
Coffee can be a bit much. Tea is much better that coffee. It's like a third of the caffeine, plus, tea is life (I'm British, please excuse my bias).
Why support it? Their specialty is Linux.
I try to not dwell on them. The more you entertain them, the more they grind you down. Accept it's natural to have them, but you cannot change the past, so focus on learning, and redemption. Use them as a force for self improvement.
I have learning difficulties, I cannot function if I focus on my mistakes because I'm prolific. Acceptance and move on.
Let's not use "sideload", as you're just installing apps.
A ref is given leeway, they choose whether to exercise or not and he didn't provide any leeway or special favour. He made a call and refs decision stands.
It still amazes me that you don't see how dangerous Balogun's challenge was. Did you not see the dude's ankle? Could have got broken. Quansah didn't even touch the guy with studs and won the ball. It was still a red. Both without intent, both deemed dangerous. One almost snapped a players ankle.
Yes, that last bit was catty, but the weird tribal defending of it it with weird justifications seemed to fit in with how Trumpy was arguing. Not necessarily within the rules of the game or historical precedents.
You obviously don't know enough about "soccer". You been listening to your presidents definitions?
A red can be given for serious foul play.
"Serious foul play is defined as "a tackle or challenge that endangers the safety of an opponent or uses excessive force or brutality.""
It fits the definition. Even with FIFA suspended the sentence they didn't overturn it.
Quansah got a red card for England despite playing for and winning the ball. Intent is not the key ingredient of a red card.
Either way, Belgium's hammered the USA even with Balogun. Tis a lol.
How convenient these tech problems are.
Sorry, we cannot delete your account because... checks notes... technical problems.
view more: next ›
Oooh, Runelite on Linux <3.
Finally.