148
submitted 1 year ago by Grappling7155@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

Canada is great at high-speed rail studies โ€” but not at actually building high-speed rail. So why is it the only country in the developed world considering a new conventional-speed passenger network?

Created by Paige Saunders with special guest Reece Martin

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"Speed costs, how fast can you afford to go?" Doesn't matter if it's cars, motorcycles, trains or sailboats. It's not a linear increase either.

Having said that, what I'd love to see is all fixed rail infrastructure turned over to a non-profit corporation. Private or public rail companies with the rolling stock would pay fees to run trains on given schedules controlled by the infrastructure company, with priority given to passenger trains. The fees would be enough to cover the costs of rail maintenance and expansion.

With railways open to anyone with rolling stock, competition is increased. Exclusive routes would be eliminated, which would help reduce freight rates.

Over time, separate passenger rail lines would be developed, at least partially subsidized by fees on the freight companies, as passenger rail typically has very thin margins.

[-] MajorMajormajormajor@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

separate passenger rail lines would be developed,

This is key. I used to work for one of the major railroad companies, and passenger trains are an afterthought. There are so many freight trains traveling that there isn't time for anything else. There was barely time for us to get on the track to do maintenance.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Are you a regular Paige Saunders viewer? That's exactly what he proposed in another one of his videos!

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 5 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/watch?v=LnNYXXgq5-w&

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

[-] Sir_Osis_of_Liver@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Nope, haven't seen it. I will now though.
I have a soft spot for trains in general. Dad (marketing director) and my grandfather (sales agent) worked for railways. Some of my ideas come from them.

They talked me out of following suit. It's a pretty tough business these days.

[-] droans@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

By law passenger rail does get priority.

It's just that the fee is so small that it's worth giving priority to freight.

[-] n2burns@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

There's a US law that passenger trains get priority, but that's rarely enforced. In Canada, there's no such law.

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
148 points (97.4% liked)

Canada

7156 readers
277 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Regions


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS