88
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2023
88 points (100.0% liked)
Solarpunk technology
2293 readers
71 users here now
Technology for a Solar-Punk future.
Airships and hydroponic farms...
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I always thought removable batteries were clearly a good thing, until I watched this YouTube video: Techquickie - Why Removable Batteries Are NEVER Coming Back
While acknowleding the pro side, it also gives some arguments for the con side:
The video is 4 years old and I haven't followed the topic too hard. I just found it interesting to have some fairly reasonable counter points for a nuanced discussion.
I owned a Kyocera DuraXT for a while. Lovely waterproof phone I frequently launched into walls and concrete whenever the iPhone crowd asked me why. Battery easily removable and replaceable. Flip phone. Able to make calls while drowning up to 5 metres underwater.
Only reason I don't use it anymore is I moved back to a country that doesn't support CDMA. Would get another one immediately if it supports Signal.
I understand it is possible to make. From my general understanding of physics and engineering, I assume it requires more effort to achieve both (replacable and resistant) than to just achieve one.
So while I approve to have the option to have a replacable battery, I'm a bit worried forcing manufacturers to include that feature would raise the price, even for customers who don't need it.
This new EU legislation actually explicitly exempts phones and tablets if in turn the manufacturers give a certain lifetime guarantee for the battery or something like that (I need to re-read the details).
My DuraXT cost me like USD70. It's been done before with older stuff for dirt cheap. Plus waterproofing is not necessarily covering all ingress points. It includes a coating on the parts as well.
That's how I can read on my Kobo ereader, spill curry on it, and clean it off at the sink.