793
submitted 1 year ago by gsa4555@lemm.ee to c/technology@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] uis@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It seems I'm going into really wierd conversation.

If you let people possess it

I think you are missing the point or are a troll. Person above said that creating and/or buying is always be illigal anyway. Or you want to make easier for abusers to collect information about their future victims by destroying privacy?

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Oh look, another shithead pedo apologist.

Creating and buying is exactly what they're trying to get people to accept, incrementally, by attacking possession first. Exploiting the warped way Americans have been taught to think about morality to do it. And your sorry ass is helping him. You doing so is not acceptable AT ALL and neither is any notion of getting rid of CP possession bans.

You will not make pedophilia socially acceptable and you will not lie to me and say that you aren't, and then go back to doing it like I know you're gonna do.

You're evil.

[-] uis@lemmy.world -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dear Faust, another one. It is so much easier to call opponent Hitler/pedophile/terrorist than counter-argue.

This is discussion about ISP's surveillance. This is not just attacking posession. This is attacking computer that relayed data stream. Technically it is message sequence, but the fact we have discussion speaks that you doesn't care. Should postman go to jail if delivered letter contained child pornography? You say that postman should open and read every letter.

Your only option to not look like complete troll is to somehow define posession in a way that excludes postman(ISP).

Here's my take on your manipulation:

You will not make espionage socially acceptable and you will not lie to me and say that you aren't, and then go back to doing so like I know you're gonna do.

[-] pinkdrunkenelephants@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

No. You're a pedo apologist. No one owes you a counter argument and you're not going to get the legitimacy you seek from a debate. Fuck off.

this post was submitted on 29 Aug 2023
793 points (96.9% liked)

Technology

59210 readers
3951 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS