170
uhhh... what do I call the "subreddits"?
(reddthat.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2023
170 points (98.3% liked)
Linux
47210 readers
783 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
They're communities. And the different servers/sites are instances.
Petition to name them SubLemmys
Instances also need better names.
Why not "servers"? That's all they are. They serve content.
Because technically, one server can host multiple instances. Instances are containerized— literally an instance of lemmy.
Is there any practical reason to actually do that, though?
I'm sorry, I don't really understand, what would be the advantage of this over hosting another community?
Can you give me an example of this catering where the server would want different rules per instance?
Sorry, i'm not trying to be rude I just genuinely don't get it.
I understand now, thank you so much!
What would you call gmail vs hotmail?
Providers.
But that's a provider/customer relationship, on the fediverse it isn't.
Agree on a technical level, but in terms of the average netizen being able to visualize the relationship, "providers" makes it much easier
I don't think we should try to visualize something that's not there just because it's (supposedly) easier for the average netizen.
Its not too far off. No, its not like an ISP or a central server, but each instance IS a "provider" of a server and service. It's not the worst moniker I have heard
For now. Commercial servers are possible, especially if communities become multi-instance in the future.
Every mature decentralized service calls them providers. Phone providers, ISPs, email providers, etc. I guess usenet just calls them "news servers", though.
It's provider/consumer (not customer, something being a "provider" doesn't necessarily mean they are selling stuff).
We are consumers, we consume the content that the instances provide, as content providers.