cypherpunks

joined 4 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

this account has created over 1100 videos since it started 5 years ago, and this video uploaded 11 days ago is already its most viewed 😂

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

yeah, i edited my comment while you were replying to note that /g is a valid flag for m/// as well. it is a valid perl matching operation precisely as-is but it can't match anything due to the spaces it has before the ^ and after the $.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

from the /g at the end i agree it looks like it could be a malformed attempt at an awk/perl/etc substitution operation, and your rewrite of it as an s/// does work, but the parts between the ^ and $ would also be a valid regexp in Perl-compatible regexp and some other dialects if not for the spaces at the start and end. And, the /g is also a flag ("Match globally, i.e., find all occurrences.") for the m/// matching operator in Perl.

The \1 and \2 are backreferences to the capture groups, which can be used not only in the replacement part but also in the pattern itself.

You can see this working by running this command:

echo '123 - 45 - 67890 45 123'|perl -ne 'print if m/^(\d{3}) - (\d{2}) - (\d{5}) \2 \1$/g'

...which will echo the string because it matches the pattern. (if you edit the input string to change, for instance, the last digit, it will no longer match and will output nothing.)

There is no input that can match the pattern as it is in the comic with the space before the ^ and after the $ however.

Interestingly backreferences are also supported by POSIX Basic Regular Expressions (BRE), but are not supported by POSIX Extended Regular Expressions (ERE). (Also the former requires you to escape parenthesis and curly braces for them to become meta characters, while the latter requires you to escape them if they're literals as Perl etc do. And neither of the POSIX flavors supports \d as a shortcut for [0-9].)

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

which music genres do you like?

Did you not read the post? OP clearly says:

I ran the numbers and I like every single music genre pretty much equally

😂

 

The papers were declassified 15 years ago today, after their initial partial publication began 55 years ago today.

Sam Roberts of The New York Times reported in 2011:

AFTER all 7,000 pages of the Pentagon Papers were released last month, a parlor game was born: Find the 11 words that the government didn’t want you to read.

Those 11 words, on a single page, were supposed to be redacted when the papers were made public in their entirety by the National Archives and Records Administration. But the National Declassification Center reversed that decision after the Lyndon B. Johnson presidential library discovered that the full page — with all 11 words — had been released in the early 1970s by the House Armed Services Committee. Any effort to reclassify the words now would only call more attention to them.

That has not stopped policy wonks from trying to guess what they were. The answer may never be known, but John Prados, director of the Vietnam Project of the National Security Archive, a research institute at George Washington University, offered up (appropriately enough) 11 possibilities and zeroed in on two.

One confirmed that the National Security Agency could monitor Soviet leaders’ encrypted telephone conversations — specifically, one in 1967 between top Soviet leaders about a Vietnam War peace feeler from the Johnson administration, conveyed by the British Prime Minister Harold Wilson.

Dr. Prados suggested that the following 11 italicized words may have been the sensitive ones: “At 9:30 A.M. today according to a telephone intercept Kosygin called Brezhnev and said [there was] a great possibility of achieving this aim.

But he was inclined to rule out those words as the redacted ones. One reason: the columnist Jack Anderson had written in 1971 about the security agency’s intercepts.

So Dr. Prados focused on a remaining possibility: instructions for an electronic monitoring mission in the Gulf of Tonkin in February 1965. The instructions mentioned an operation “covering a two destroyer Patrol Group with on-line Crypto Ratt” (translation: a secret secure-line radio Teletype that automatically encoded sensitive messages).

Although the agency declassified documents in 2008 that identified the equipment, this is the most likely redaction, Dr. Prados said, because the agency tends to protect secrets reflexively, whether or not they were already released.

Leslie H. Gelb, who directed the government task force that wrote the Pentagon Papers and is now president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations, concurs that the radio teletype is the most likely.

“I didn’t even remember that was there,” Mr. Gelb said. “If I had focused on it, I wouldn’t have put it in because I wouldn’t have wanted to reveal it.”

In the end, Dr. Prados said, what is most revealing is the government’s enduring obsession with secrecy. “The most distressing aspect of the 11 words episode,” he said, “is that anyone at all felt a need to try and put toothpaste back into the tube after the passage of four decades’ time.”

note: today the internet archive only has archived 404s of the page which the New York Times linked to containing all of John Prados' 11 guesses about the 11 words at George Washington University's National Security Archive.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

tuta is (like proton) snake oil. (here is one of my old comments about why....)

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

every email provider lets you "keep your own private key" as long as you do encryption using the interoperable OpenPGP standard with software running on your own computer. many email providers will recommend that you do this and will even instruct you about how to (eg, the more reputable options in this thread such as migadu, mailbox.org, posteo, and even fastmail all have instructions for how to use some implementation of pgp to encrypt your email).

meanwhile any company selling non-standard "email encryption" (eg, proton and tuta) which is not pgp-compatible (or in the corporate world, s/mime is also a standard...) is in the snake oil business and should be boycotted regardless of which shitty youtubers they're sponsoring this week.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

note: the above 3 list items are all rendered differently despite being the same markdown (-)

screenshots:

in the view on my user page, the two comments are the same as each other but still different from the post:

cc @dessalines@lemmy.ml @sleeplessone@lemmy.ml (sorry i still don't have a github account with which to open lemmy issues...)

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)
  • this is another list item
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)
  • this is another list item
1
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by cypherpunks@lemmy.ml to c/test@lemmy.ml
 
  • this is a list item
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 days ago (3 children)

He won't.

  • Apoc
[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Fendit, refusing this meme:

Morpheus (Laurence Fishburne) with Neo (Keanu Reeves) reflected in his glasses. Impact outline font, top text "WHAT IF I TOLD YOU" bottom text "MORPHEUS NEVER SAID 'WHAT IF TOLD YOU' IN ANY OF THE MOVIES"

who's Fendit?Maybe some Tamarian from a novel, or maybe made up for an academic paper? The only search engine result i see for "Fendit, refusing the flame" is the paper Picard understanding Darmok: A Dataset and Model for Metaphor-Rich Translation in a Constructed Language which "assembles a Tamarian-English dictionary of utterances from the original episode and several follow-on novels".

(it seemed appropriate to respond to this meme with some apocryphal Tamarian.)

 

This work assembles a Tamarian- English dictionary of utterances from the original episode and several follow-on novels, and uses this to construct a parallel corpus of 456 English-Tamarian utterances.

for more serious writing on the Tamarian language subject, see this and chapter 5 of this.

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 days ago

that may be true but you should consider that HR departments are notorious for failing to document complaints from members of socially-disadvantaged groups

view more: next ›