614
submitted 1 year ago by xuxebiko@kbin.social to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

The legal ruling against the Internet Archive has come down in favour of the rights of authors.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Zacryon@feddit.de 133 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If we want authors to survive, we’ve got to stop assuming that authors’ intellectual labour is a public commodity.

Ah yes, because it's the fault of (internet) libraries and not greedy publishers who try to keep the royalties for their authors as low as possible. /s

How about looking where this problem starts instead of where it ends?

[-] rgb3x3@beehaw.org 25 points 1 year ago

Piracy dies (mostly) with easy and reasonably priced ways to pay for content. Most people don't want to do something illegal and want to support those who make content.

But when publishers like Warner Brothers are removing content from services making pirating sites the only place to find artists' work, then little are going to pirate.

Without sites like the Internet Archive, so much stuff would risk being lost forever because of greedy copyright practices.

[-] xuxebiko@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

IA helps keep democracy alive. Documentaries that are banned by dictators, like the BBC documentary on Modi that was banned in India by Modi, would be unavailable to people without IA.

[-] Paradoxvoid@aussie.zone 8 points 1 year ago

If we want authors to survive, we’ve got to stop assuming that authors’ intellectual labour is a public commodity.

The irony being that this is exactly what copyright was originally intended to facilitate - authors creating works to become public domain within a relatively short period of time.

[-] ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Especially fucking Wiley. If you're a student paying hundreds for a textbook with a "supplemental code" that makes it so you can't buy it used, then it's probably by fucking Wiley. Fucking greedy cunts.

[-] MacroCyclo@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

There are authors starting to publish without a publisher. I think that is the right direction, not making all books free. Maybe once the publishers have less control there will be some copyright reforms to shorten the time it takes to bring works into the public domain. Right now it is 95 years from publishing, but I think the author's life plus 30 years or something might make a bit more sense. For example, George Orwell has been dead for over 70 years, but his works are still under copyright.

this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2023
614 points (98.7% liked)

World News

32500 readers
600 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS