12
submitted 1 year ago by haxor@derp.foo to c/hackernews@derp.foo

There is a discussion on Hacker News, but feel free to comment here as well.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TheBeege@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Man, keep in mind patent law. If oil companies develop an efficient version of the tech first, it could prevent more savory groups from building things out.

On the other hand, the Department of Energy person made good sense. We tried fighting the oil companies, and it didn't work. We shouldn't keep trying the same strategy and expecting things to change after they haven't worked.

But yeah, it's just going into more fracking. Would the sequestered CO2 be less than that generated by the new oil? I somehow doubt it.

I think best case, the oil companies develop the tech but can't patent it for some reason, then we get mass production as a standalone industry such that the new oil doesn't matter. Maybe likely case is that oil companies develop the tech, patent it, then make profit of the government using it to fix their climate mess. Sounds like an oil exec strategy to me

this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
12 points (87.5% liked)

Hacker News

3943 readers
1 users here now

This community serves to share top posts on Hacker News with the wider fediverse.

Rules0. Keep it legal

  1. Keep it civil and SFW
  2. Keep it safe for members of marginalised groups

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS