28
submitted 1 year ago by snacks@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

Leaving aside the squeaky indignations of our inadequate prime minister, and the frankly boring questions by the opposition leader. what exactly is the purpose of this braying, deluded clown show? We don’t get anything of use, we don’t get anything except question avoidance and grandstanding followed by someone shouting ‘more’ so that others nearby will also make the same noise. As if shouting a noise makes the point rather than the brain of the person supposed to be in charge.

I can switch it off but I also don’t understand what the actual use of this excercise is.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

I like to listen to it every week but the Tories just keep on spinning every fact to make it look like they've done better than ever before.

Needs a decent fact checking service. The whole thing is over the top though and the rules in the house is antiquated.

[-] Cliffjumper@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Especially if the fact checking was in real time, preferably with some variation on the QI klaxon.

As soon as the feckless bastard says something inaccurate a big screen behind him would let him, and everyone watching, know.

[-] olivermantell@zirk.us 1 points 1 year ago

@Cliffjumper @UKFilmNerd Something like a cricket ‘review’ system could be useful (you can refer something you think is wrong, but if *you’re* then adjudged to be wrong, you lose one of three reviews)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
28 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3067 readers
102 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS