793
submitted 1 year ago by Grayox@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Amazon.com’s Whole Foods Market doesn’t want to be forced to let workers wear “Black Lives Matter” masks and is pointing to the recent US Supreme Court ruling permitting a business owner to refuse services to same-sex couples to get federal regulators to back off.

National Labor Relations Board prosecutors have accused the grocer of stifling worker rights by banning staff from wearing BLM masks or pins on the job. The company countered in a filing that its own rights are being violated if it’s forced to allow BLM slogans to be worn with Whole Foods uniforms.

Amazon is the most prominent company to use the high court’s June ruling that a Christian web designer was free to refuse to design sites for gay weddings, saying the case “provides a clear roadmap” to throw out the NLRB’s complaint.

The dispute is one of several in which labor board officials are considering what counts as legally-protected, work-related communication and activism on the job.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] freeindv@monyet.cc -1 points 1 year ago

? Learn what that means before you use it

[-] Rambi@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Of course, why would I use a word if I didn't know the meaning? I said you were projecting because you probably can't imagine yourself being able to live without Amazon Prime, and you're projecting that onto them which is my theory for why you think they're lying. Because otherwise I can't imagine why you would think someone would lie about something so mundane and trivial.

[-] freeindv@monyet.cc -1 points 1 year ago

That's not what projection is

[-] Rambi@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago
[-] Rambi@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago

You're not going to stop responding just because I showed you that you're wrong, are you? This was quite entertaining.

[-] bermuda@beehaw.org -1 points 1 year ago
[-] Rambi@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Considering each time he's just reiterating something wrong with 0 reason for it, that's enough times.

[-] freeindv@monyet.cc -1 points 1 year ago
[-] Rambi@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

I already linked you an article explaining that definition of projection which originates with Freud. You are wrong and I demonstrated it conclusively.

[-] freeindv@monyet.cc -1 points 1 year ago

Lol you're wrong and I demonstrated that conclusively

this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
793 points (95.5% liked)

World News

32453 readers
472 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS