770
The Moral Case for No Longer Engaging With Elon Musk’s X
(www.bloomberg.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
770 points (87.6% liked)
Technology
59861 readers
5350 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They tend to mirror the content on other sites, so they can further grow their communities there too. Can you explain to me how Twitter remains integral when the content is available elsewhere too?
It's integral to them because the bulk of their audience, including crowdfunders and commissioners and other potential paying customers, remains there. It can be a difference between having a viable artistic career or needing another job. Xitter is in clear decline and worse by the day, but it still outnumbers the alternatives by hundreds of millions of active users.
Then the solution is for people who like art to accept invites and follow them on BlueSky.
Or to use Mastodon.
Hundreds of millions of those active users don't care about art unless Elon's stealing it.
It's definitely better for them to move out but that's a whole process, if they want to try to bring even a fraction of their audience along.
Eh, by that measure there's nowhere to go, because even here I see some people with a wild disregard towards art.
But really, there are people who care or those artists wouldn't ever have had a career to begin with.