How do you think about Snap? (kbin.social)

submitted 1 year ago by wave_walnut@kbin.social to c/linux@kbin.social

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm very beginner of Linux server admin. Few days ago I set up snap version of nextcloud server app on my own Ubuntu VPS server, and I found that Snap system might be focused to build original file system hierarchy in /snap directory, and I felt a little weird about that.

For example, Linux file system hierarchy is defined to set server app config into /etc/app/conf.d or so.
But snap version app tend to set it into /snap/app/current/app/config or so.
It sounds so complicated for me.

So I want to know about how Snap is thought by others. I'm happy if you might tell me something here.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] moon_matter@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Package maintainers prefer appimages/snaps/flatpaks over native because it's as close to write once, deploy everywhere as we're going to get. Maintaining packages for distros is a thankless job often done by volunteers because there's no possible way for the developer to maintain packages for every distro.

this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023

1 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

59 readers

2 users here now

founded 2 years ago