this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
1765 points (99.3% liked)

internet funeral

7595 readers
49 users here now

ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤart of the internet

What is this place?

!hmmm@lemmy.world with text and titles

• post obscure and surreal art with text

• nothing memetic, nothing boring

• unique textural art images

• Post only images or gifs (except for meta posts)

Guidlines

• no video posts are allowed

• No memes. Not even surreal ones. Post your memes on !surrealmemes@sh.itjust.works instead

• If your submission can be posted to !hmmm@lemmy.world (I.e. no text images), It should be posted there instead

This is a curated magazine. Post anything and everything. It will either stay up or be lost into the void.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] null@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

And I can do that all in 5 minutes without owning one?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Easily. The device doesn't care who owns it, you can use one owned by another person.

[–] null@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't know anyone who owns one either.

But go ahead, do your experiment and report back. Should only take you 5 minutes to prove your claim.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why should I do it, when plenty of people have already done so, and reported the results I talked about?

[–] null@slrpnk.net 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Are you unable to Google, or are you acting willfully dense?

First example I found: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00779-018-1174-x

[–] null@slrpnk.net -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lol that looks like 5 minutes of work to you?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

No, a study that studies way more than what I described doesn't look like 5 minutes of work to me, why would it?

[–] null@slrpnk.net -3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So you gonna spot me the $40?

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Why would I? Why isn't the study I've linked sufficient?

Why do you want me to disprove something you should easily be able to prove, and that other people have already disproven?

[–] null@slrpnk.net -2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The study you linked is behind a $40 paywall

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
  1. Have you never heard of Sci-Hub or other services to circumvent such paywalls?
  2. As I said, more than enough people have made such studies.

You could have easily figured out either of those if you were taking this conversation seriously. You obviously aren't, so I'll stop here.

[–] null@slrpnk.net -2 points 2 years ago

So that's a no on the $40?