214

The Supreme Court rejects Biden's plan to wipe away $400 billion in student loan debt (apnews.com)

submitted 1 year ago by NightOwl@lemmy.fmhy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

177 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Karate_Jesus420@lemmy.dbzer0.com 66 points 1 year ago

Fuck Trump and his supreme court. We're going to be suffering the effects of Republican stupidity for the next 40 years.

[-] Pacifist@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago

If you need any reason not to believe in god, it's that Trump got to appoint THREE FUCKING SUPREME COURT JUSTICES

[-] seesaw@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I don't know enough about US politics, but can't Biden change the court justices? If the answer is no, how did Trump change?

[-] LetsGOikz@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Justices need to die or retire in order for there to be a vacancy for a President to appoint a new Justice to. There was a vacancy at the start of Trump's term due to a death during Obama's that the Republicans refused to confirm an appointment for, and then there was a retirement (Kennedy) and death (RBG) during his term as well.

[-] patchymoose@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

For anyone who isn't familiar, RBG was a liberal Supreme Court justice that was getting very old, and a lot of people thought she should have retired during Obama's term, where she could have been replaced by him. Some accuse her of stubbornness/hubris for not stepping down when it was "safe", and point out that her whole legacy is now being undone.

Others point out that common wisdom at the time was that Hillary was going to he a shoe in as the next president, and nobody expected a Republican to win, including RBG.

Anyway, I'm not taking a stance but just fleshing that out for anyone who is interested in the controversy.

[-] dingus@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Others point out that common wisdom at the time was that Hillary was going to he a shoe in as the next president

Just to also point out. This "common wisdom" is part of why Hillary lost and why a lot of people argued that RBG should have resigned during her term because the next Democratic President wasn't a shoe-in, and people couldn't just rely on that.

People also seem to forget that both a Bush and a Clinton were running in 2016 and in a way, Trump being elected was a initially a rejection of "political dynasties" as Presidencies (which then immediately turned to his followers wanting him as a forever king, but that's a different issue entirely). I had a Bush or a Clinton as President for twenty years of my life (roughly a third of the average lifespan for a US citizen). From my youth until I was no longer considered a youth, well into adulthood. I remember being frustrated at being faced with both a Bush and a Clinton in the primaries. I know lots of other people, on both sides of the aisle, did too. Nobody wanted more of the same (I know Hillary didn't view herself as "more of the same" of her husband, and for good reason, but that wasn't common opinion).

The entire thing about it being "common wisdom" was spoken from a position of privilege by elite Democrats and ignoring that common people weren't every excited about either Bush or Clinton but Clinton got shoehorned in anyway while Bush had his "please clap" moment. It's not a shoe-in if you have to use a shoehorn, mind you.