212

A radio anchor in the southern Philippines has been fatally shot in his studio in a brazen attack witnessed by people watching the programme live on Facebook.

The gunman gained entry to the home-based radio station of Juan Jumalon, a provincial news broadcaster known also as DJ Johnny Walker, by pretending to be a listener. He then shot him twice during a live morning broadcast in Calamba town in Misamis Occidental province, police said.

The attacker snatched the victim’s gold necklace before fleeing on a motorcycle with a companion who had been waiting outside, police said. An investigation is under way to identify the gunman and establish if the attack was work-related.

The Philippines has long been regarded as one of the most dangerous places in the world for journalists.

President Ferdinand Marcos Jr strongly condemned the shooting and said he had ordered the national police to track down, arrest and prosecute the killers.

In 2009, members of a powerful political clan and their associates gunned down 58 people, including 32 media workers, in an attack in southern Maguindanao province. It was the deadliest single attack on journalists in recent history.

While the mass killing was later linked to a violent electoral rivalry common in many rural areas, it also showcased the threats faced by journalists in the Philippines. A surfeit of unlicensed guns and private armies controlled by powerful clans and weak law enforcement in rural regions are among the security concerns that journalists face in the poverty-stricken country.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Substance_P@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago

"President Ferdinand Marcos Jr strongly condemned the shooting"

It blows my mind that this corrupt family is still in power.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Ask my 52-yo Filipina fiancé, she was there until 2 years ago and is a staunch Marcos "loyalist".

Asking her about it was a wild ride, so much I had never heard. I had wondered how much was propaganda, and she can explain that as well.

I'll get it all wrong, but I understand he built hospitals and schools and roads and more. She said everything stagnated and fell back to corruption after Marcos Sr. was ousted. Can't remember what she said about Imelda, but I think my gf thought she just a dipstick.

She cautiously optimistic about Marcos Jr.

[-] corpse@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Bull-fucking-shit. That's what apologists say.

But where the fuck did the money come from? What about all the money stolen? The distribution of the government agencies/powers to cronies? The human rights violations? All the fucking murders and rapes.

Damn right, they better have built some infrastructure. Pasting their names everywhere they could. But at what cost? And fuck, not a high bar - a decent government should do that.

But again, at what cost? With all the money that they fucking stole, all the deaths in their wake, and the chaos that had to happen for their ousting to happen, it's not surprising that corruption had an easy way in.

And don't think that Imelda was innocent or naive. Junior wasn't a kid during this time either. They fucking know. They've been working on white-washing their name for decades now.

But I will never respect them or their work as long as they deny the sins of the Marcos regime. It's like being a holocaust denier.

load more comments (11 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Nov 2023
212 points (98.6% liked)

World News

38965 readers
2223 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS