206
One more (hexbear.net)
submitted 11 months ago by RNAi@hexbear.net to c/science@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 5 points 11 months ago

we accomplished all of that with the theoreticals

...No. There were plenty of tests, for example the atomic pile built at the University of Chicago. They certainly didn't just do a bunch of math and then build an industrial nuclear power plant on the first go.

there is criticism from actual physicists over these colliders

I don't think you're making the same criticisms they are (I last read some of those criticisms a while ago, though).

[-] LaughingLion@hexbear.net 1 points 11 months ago

they literally did do that

the first particle accelerator was built like over a decade later

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I'm not saying a particle accelerator was used to test the theoretical underpinnings of nuclear power. I'm saying testing was done, that is, they did not "accomplish[] all of that with the theoreticals." They just used earlier tools.

To test modern physics, many (not all) physicists say the tool they need is an accelerator.

this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
206 points (100.0% liked)

Science

22818 readers
7 users here now

Welcome to Hexbear's science community!

Subscribe to see posts about research and scientific coverage of current events

No distasteful shitposting, pseudoscience, or COVID-19 misinformation.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS