495
submitted 8 months ago by RmDebArc_5@lemmy.ml to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 8 months ago

unpopular opinion. homebrew is better than apt or yum.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Probably why it's an option on some distros

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world -3 points 8 months ago

Sorry you're wrong 😛

Homebrew only supports one user (AFAIK). We had shared iMacs at work, and some stuff was installed using homebrew with the permissions modified so everyone could access what was installed. One night I got bored at work and upgraded some things... Which changed the permissions back to only the user that installed the cask (or whatever) and broke the terminal and other things for everyone else. My coworker was pissed the next time he saw me.

Any sane Linux package manager (I'm not counting Snap and FlatPak) installs stuff system-wide and all users can access the installed packages.

Linux is inherently a multi-user OS but Apple apparently stripped that feature from OS X.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 8 months ago

Of course things are going to break if you take something that's meant to be installed per-user and open up one user's installation to everyone else on the system. Not Brew's fault your company's IT used it outside spec.

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

It's no necessarily Brew's fault either, but more the shitty way Apple decided to implement it.

this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
495 points (86.3% liked)

linuxmemes

20351 readers
933 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS