90
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by TCB13@lemmy.world to c/selfhosted@lemmy.world

The Banana Pi BPI-M7 single board computer is equipped with up to 32GB RAM and 128GB eMMC flash, and features an M.2 2280 socket for one NVMe SSD, three display interfaces (HDMI, USB-C, MIPI DSI), two camera connectors, dual 2.5GbE, WiFi 6 and Bluetooth 5.2, a few USB ports, and a 40-pin GPIO header for expansion.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ck_@discuss.tchncs.de 71 points 9 months ago

My experience with Banana PIs is that they require some obscure kernel to run because the developers cannot be bothered to bring their hardware support and drivers upstream. Same was true for uboot. Has any of that changed in the meantime? If not, that this is a no go for me.

[-] RegalPotoo@lemmy.world 43 points 9 months ago

Yeah, this is an absolute blocker for me. If its not supported upstream then it's a no-go. I don't want to be running whatever hacked up Ubuntu image the manufacturer put together then stopped updating in 3 months when the next iteration gets churned out

[-] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 36 points 9 months ago

It's the same, I picked up an Orange Pi 5 plus on sale and didn't even think about the kernel and module driver situation. It's rough. Joshua-Riek/ubuntu-rockchip and the other contributors do great work to un-fuck the situation and get a non-screwy ubuntu install cobbled together, but in the comments for issues even he gives off a "well, the situation is shit" sort of vibe.

I won't buy another rockchip sbc.

[-] ck_@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 9 months ago

Yeah, I figured. I'll stick to the Raspberries then, mainly because the "just work"™

[-] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

That's a shame.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 14 points 9 months ago

That's too bad because the specs OP listed are pretty great plus I'd love to see the Raspberry Pi Foundation (or whichever corporate entity controls production and sales) knocked down a few pegs due to their anti-consumer behavior over the last several years.

[-] ck_@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 9 months ago

Definitely, the specs are nice and I also cannot say I'm a huge fan of the RPi foundation. More competition in this space would be great, but not having mainline support is just too much of a hassle.

[-] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 7 points 9 months ago

Yeah they are a massive fuck around unless you already know how

[-] cucumber_sandwich@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

I had the same impression until I dusted off my banana pi one last month and there was an up-to-date armbian image for it. Totally pleasant surprise.

[-] ck_@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 9 months ago

Fair, but I'm not running armbian, so my requirements boils down to: Must run any up to date Linux distro without having to side-load custom kernels or anything. Should work out of the box.

this post was submitted on 22 Nov 2023
90 points (71.2% liked)

Selfhosted

39143 readers
273 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS