101

Why do a lot of fediverse instances put their software (i.e. Lemmy/Mastodon) in their name somehow? (lemm.ee)

submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by ALostInquirer@lemm.ee to c/fediverse@lemmy.world

59 comments fedilink hide all child comments

It kind of makes me think of how odd it would have been if many of the old forums named themselves like bookclub.phpbulletin.com, metalheads.vbulletin.net, or something.

There's nothing wrong with doing that, obviously, but it's struck me as another interesting quirk of fediverse instances/sites. Generally as soon as you visit them you can tell by the site interface or an icon somewhere what software they're using.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] vettnerk@lemmy.ml 16 points 7 months ago

Yes, it would be very weird for server addresses to have the service name as a subdomain. Like a common prefix of web servers to signify that it's serving world wide web.

On a more serious note, this used to be fairly common for many protocols to ensure loaf balancing between different protocols - you'd have one server for www, one for ftp, and so on.

Also, from an administrative point of view, it's more manageable when you can, for example, add an entire (sub)domain to the firewall rules.