Sometimes in the effort of making a topic palatable, it's stripped of its sprit completely.

If this was published by The Sun or something I'd understand as a positive - at least it's an article not bent on demonization and at least advances a nuanced and humanized view -, but from the Walrus... this level of two-sidedness is probably in the lower end of what the readership expects already?

Still, I thought it was insightful. I still don't read as many feature-length trans testimonial/articles like this as I probably should.