129
submitted 11 months ago by kpw@kbin.social to c/science@lemmy.world

The Stanford Prison Experiment, one of the most famous and compelling psychological studies of all time, told us a tantalizingly simple story about human nature.

The study took paid participants and assigned them to be “inmates” or “guards” in a mock prison at Stanford University. Soon after the experiment began, the “guards” began mistreating the “prisoners,” implying evil is brought out by circumstance. The authors, in their conclusions, suggested innocent people, thrown into a situation where they have power over others, will begin to abuse that power. And people who are put into a situation where they are powerless will be driven to submission, even madness.

The Stanford Prison Experiment has been included in many, many introductory psychology textbooks and is often cited uncritically. It’s the subject of movies, documentaries, books, television shows, and congressional testimony.

But its findings were wrong. Very wrong. And not just due to its questionable ethics or lack of concrete data — but because of deceit.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fireweed@lemmy.world 53 points 11 months ago

Yo mods, we really could use a tag for articles that are old. In this case, half a decade!

[-] laverabe@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

there is no such tool to tag a post as such, the mod tools are still very limited. It's either remove or approve, and it's hard to draw where that line should go sometimes.

[-] fireweed@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Bummer. Is it possible to require titles of submissions that are more than X months old include the source date? Especially since Lemmy allows for title editing it wouldn't even require post resubmission to comply.

[-] laverabe@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I think since Lemmy is still very low on content, so any restrictions should be light. Right now Lemmy is in the wild west phase, and it'll probably be like that for awhile until there is more content.

A long list of rules and requirements worked great on a subreddit with a million people, but right now I think less rules is better for the time being, at least until there are multiple posts a day.

[-] fireweed@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Fair enough. In the meanwhile, thanks for modding and helping keep the sub alive!

[-] m3t00@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

down vote is all I got. down and scroll. liberal ad/script blocking. Firefox has this reading mode. If that doesn't work I usually skip the whole site. can't sit here all day and delete trash. let op know your displeasure and hope they try harder in the future. obvious spam gets trashed on site. you can read any account's post history by visiting their profile.

this post was submitted on 15 Dec 2023
129 points (84.9% liked)

science

14885 readers
322 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS