25
submitted 1 year ago by BrikoX@vlemmy.net to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Halferect@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 year ago

Telling people lies when it comes to health isn't protected by the first amendment. People think the first amendment is this vast catch all and you can just say anything but it's really not. You really can't just say anything you want. A example of speech that's not protected is fraud, so if I make a website or blog that looks legit and it says drink bleach for magic powers that wouldn't be covered under free speech, or telling someone to kill themselves isn't protected either. The first amendment isn't really that broad when you get into the nitty gritty

[-] zblofu@lemmy.world -4 points 1 year ago

I absolutely agree that making false medical claims in advertising is not protected speech. Fraud and threats are already criminal and should treated as such, but the types of speech that are being censored are not primarily illegal forms of speech. The types of speech that are being censored are not limited to cases of fraud or threats, they are whatever types of speech the current executive branch deems harmful. I think that is dangerous, even if I also personally agree that those particular types of legal speech are indeed harmful.

[-] Halferect@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean according to the article the only stuff they asked to be taken off was false covid stuff... So I don't think that falls under first amendment rights. It was stuff like the covid vaccine doesn't work and it will give you AIDS, kinda like yelling fire when there is no fire isn't protected

this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
25 points (75.5% liked)

World News

32287 readers
1191 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS