103
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by twelvewings@lemmy.world to c/chatgpt@lemmy.world

I asked GPT4 to refactor a simple, working python script for my smart lights... and it completely butchered the code and apologized mid-generation.

No amount of pleading or correction would get it to function as it did just a week or two ago.

It is so over.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 4 points 1 year ago
[-] twelvewings@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh great, so now I have to pay on top of my Plus membership?

A couple of prompts already cost be $0.03. I could easily run up hundreds of dollars if I used it as much as I have in the past.

Do you have any tips or preferring settings when using the Playground to code?

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It does not add up that much unless you're tokenizing a metric ton of content. It's a few extra bucks and you can set a rate limit. I have rarely hit a 5 dollar mark with consistent writing. Limit it to a fiver and see how it goes. As for the settings, it is really model specific. There are a ton of guides out there, though for effective instructing. I believe Wolfram Alpha has a few. Their formatting is nice: https://medium.com/machine-minds/chatgpt-python-machine-learning-prompts-abefc544412c Playground pricing is what they use for commercial API use. It has to be affordable.

[-] mango@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago

It actually works out cheaper in most cases to use the playground over actually paying for chat gpt plus

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

^ This guy playgrounds.

this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
103 points (96.4% liked)

ChatGPT

8909 readers
1 users here now

Unofficial ChatGPT community to discuss anything ChatGPT

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS