-4
Mike Johnson’s Christian Nationalism—And Yours
(americanmind.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
-4 points (0.0% liked)
Conservative
377 readers
30 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I find that this type of connotation/denotation blending is really common among leftists, at least in internet circles. An extremely benign academic definition is used to paint labels, but then it's rhetorically matched with informal understanding as a pejorative term.
Do you mean like when people say things like "international bankers" and they really mean Jews, or when Reagan talked about "Welfare queens" and a "strapping young buck using food stamps" and he very clearly meant black people?
Or like when people say "border crisis" or "illegal immigrants" they are actually saying "OMG you should be afraid of all the violent ethnics coming to rape your white women!"
I agree that's a real shame that people do that.
Lmao keep your your delusions