143
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] misaloun@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

I always redo it lol, which is kind of a waste but I enjoy it.

Maybe a related question is what I wish I could do if I had the time (which I will do eventually. Some I plan to do very soon):

  • self host wireguard instead of using tailscale
  • self host a ACME-like setup for self signed certificates for TLS and HTTPS
  • self host encrypted git server for private stuff
  • setup a file watcher on clients to sync my notes on-save automatically using rsync (yes I know I can use syncthing. Don't wanna!)
[-] PhilBro@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Wireguard is super quick and easy to setup and use, I'd highly recommend to do that now. I don't understand the recent obsession with Tailscale apart from bypassing cgNAT

[-] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 year ago

Tailscale is an abstraction layer built on top of Wireguard. It handles things like assigning IP addresses, sharing public kegs, and building a mesh network without you having to do any manual work. People like easy solutions, which is why it's popular.

To manually build a mesh with Wireguard, every node needs to have every other node listed as a peer in their config. I've done this manually before, or you could automate it (eg using Ansible or a tool specifically for Wireguard meshes). With Tailscale, you just log in using one of their client apps, and everything just works automatically.

[-] dan@upvote.au 2 points 1 year ago

self host wireguard instead of using tailscale

You cam self-host a Headscale server, which is an open-source implementation of the Tailscale server. The Tailscale client apps can connect to it.

[-] peril33@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What is the downside of using tailscale over wireguard?

[-] misaloun@reddthat.com 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think there's any significant downsides. I suppose you are dependent on their infrastructure and uptime. If they ever go down, or for any reason stop offering their services, then you're out of luck. But yeah that's not significant.

The reason I want to do this is it gives me more control over the setup in case I ever wanted to customize it or the wireguard config, and also teaches me more in general, which will enable me to better debug.

[-] dan@upvote.au 1 points 1 year ago

I suppose you are dependent on their infrastructure and uptime

AFAIK their infra is only used for configuring the VPN. The VPN itself is a regular peer-to-peer Wireguard VPN. If their infra goes down while a VPN tunnel is connected, the tunnel should keep working. I've never tested that, though.

You can self-host your own Headscale server to avoid using their infra.

this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
143 points (98.0% liked)

Selfhosted

39143 readers
273 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS