216
submitted 7 months ago by plinky@hexbear.net to c/labour@hexbear.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Rom@hexbear.net 72 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

My brain skimmed over the "per day" part and assumed it meant 21.5 hours a week, and I thought that wasn't so bad. 21.5 hours a day is literally going to kill people though. Like the human body actually cannot survive such a thing long term.

[-] stillitcomes@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's not long term. If you read the linked article, it's still 52 hours a week. This change just defines how those 52 hours can be distributed. So if a company really really wanted its workers to work the max hours a day for some reason it'd be 2.5 days of straight work and 4.5 days off. Which would still be miserable but significantly less absurd.

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 24 Jan 2024
216 points (100.0% liked)

labour

7625 readers
1 users here now

One big comm for one big union! Post union / labour related news, memes, questions, guides, etc.

Here Are Some Resources to help with organizing and direct action

:red-fist:

And More to Come!

If you want to speak to a union organizer, reach out here.

:iww: :big-bill: :sabo:

Rules:

  1. Follow The Hexbear Code of Conduct.

  2. No anti-union content, especially from the right. Critiques and discussions of different organizing strategies is fine.

  3. Don’t dox yourself or others.

  4. Labour Party content goes in !electoralism@www.hexbear.net, !politics@www.hexbear.net, or a :dumpster-fire:.

When we fight we win!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS