65
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by MaliciousKebab@sh.itjust.works to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

signal-2024-02-01-19-47-41-855

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chinstrap@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

i didn't mean as a version. I meant as overuse of streams

[-] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 3 points 7 months ago

How would you have preferred to solve it? Using for loops?

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Python style iterator comprehension

(wonder if someone has made that into a macro. if no one has I will)

[-] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 1 points 7 months ago

I don't think it would be readable. Too much going on. You'd need an outer iter over lines, an inner over words, a check for number and a conversion. And there would be zero error handling.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 2 points 7 months ago

No less readable than half the Python comprehensions I've written.

zero error handling.

Not necessarily. The macro could look for a ? at the end of the final expression (the bit that comes first in a comprehension) and return a Result.

[-] crispy_kilt@feddit.de 2 points 7 months ago

Right, of course, I meant no error handling in the Python impl

this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
65 points (91.1% liked)

Programmer Humor

19138 readers
681 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS