NYT: Russian attack on NATO looms as Trump threatens to abandon alliance (euromaidanpress.com)

submitted 10 months ago by LaFinlandia@sopuli.xyz to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] MrCookieRespect@reddthat.com -3 points 10 months ago

If you attack EU, you die. That shall be rule.

First strike is the sharpest sword and the biggest shield.

Why would you need to understand something when that something already fucks up the whole world?

[-] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 17 points 10 months ago

The EU doesn't need nukes to defend itself from a Russian invasion. Ukraine got the West's hand-me-downs and has completely stalemated Russia with them for over a year. Russia's conventional forces are a paper tiger. The question is will Russia resort to nukes when the war goes sideways for them.

[-] rayyy@lemmy.world 0 points 10 months ago

Russia will continue to soften up the EU, and the US with hybrid psyops warfare then take bits and pieces of real estate. It is working quit well now actually.

[-] letsgocrazy@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Depends how you consider "quite well" - the total collapse of Russia's military credbility, the insanely high casualty rate, the loss of material, for something that they were already allowed to use in Crimea, and a part of the Donbas?

I wouldn't call that "well" at all. Seems like a completely disaster.