333

Hot take: LLM technology is being purposefully framed as AI to avoid accountability (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 year ago by assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

89 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Which of the following sounds more reasonable?

I shouldn't have to pay for the content that I use to tune my LLM model and algorithm.
We shouldn't have to pay for the content we use to train and teach an AI.

By calling it AI, the corporations are able to advocate for a position that's blatantly pro corporate and anti writer/artist, and trick people into supporting it under the guise of a technological development.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] MxM111@kbin.social -3 points 1 year ago

And what are they doing? To remind, OpenAI is non-profit.

[-] Starfarer@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

I thought they moved to for profit back in 2019?

[-] MxM111@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

Wikipedia lists them as non-profit https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenAI

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

They're a non-profit managed by a for-profit, who's received most of their funding from another for-proft.

this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023

333 points (91.5% liked)

Technology

59542 readers

3711 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS